PERSPEKTIF BARU PENELITIAN KONSELING: METODE KUALITATIF DAN KUANTATIF SECARA ONLINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/sjigc.v2i1.25Keywords:
Penelitian, Konseling, OnlineAbstract
This paper attempts to present the use of online media in counseling research. The online research method is a new trend, where researchers can collect data through the internet media. With that being said, there’s a question arises, “what is the best online media” so that research gets data that meets the validity standards in scientific research. The research was conducted at the Aleogama Porto Guidance Counseling community, which is located at the Aleogama.com website, in Bandung. They carry out counseling service activities using quantitative and qualitative data in an integrated manner. This research approach uses a qualitative study. The data were collected using observation, documentation and interviews. Observations are aimed at the online service process. Documentation in the form of applications and printed data. The interviews were aimed at the components of their human resources, including public relations, coordinators, hosts, testers and administrators. The results of data collection show that using both quantitative and qualitative approaches, the use of online media can provide time effectiveness, maximize human resources and reduce costs in conducting research. A more detailed explanation of the strengths, weaknesses and ways of obtaining data by the research subjects either through questionnaires, surveys or interviews, for counseling research is also described. Either with or without the regulations validated to minimize direct physical contact, online media has contributed effectively in developing the research and theory concerned.
References
Beckstead, A. L., & Morrow, S. L. (2004). Mormon clients’ experiences of conversion therapy: The need for a new treatment approach. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004267555
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Prentice Hall.
Faisal, S. (2000). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Hakikat beserta karakteristik dan variasi. Prodi BK FIP UM.
Frick, A., Bächtiger, M. T., & Reips, U. D. (2001). Dimensions of internet. In U. D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science. Pabst Science Publ.
Guba, Egon G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E.G. Guba (Ed.), The Paradigm Dialogue (pp. 17–27). Sage Publications.
Guba, Egon G, & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
Haverkamp, B. E. (2005). Ethical perspectives on qualitative research in applied psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.146
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., Hess, S. A., Knox, S., Williams, E. N., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
Hoshmand, L. T. (1999). Locating the qualitative. In M. Kopala & L. A. Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 15–24). Sage Publications.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (Fifth ed). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (Third ed). Thousand Oaks.
Martens, M. P., & Haase, R. F. (2006). Advanced applications of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005283395
McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quaterly, 77(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700107
Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
Morrow, S. L., & Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative research for counseling psychology. Handbook of Counseling Psychology, 3, 199–230.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
Ponterotto, J. G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. The Qualitative Report.
Ramli, M. (2017). Penelitian bimbingan dan konseling. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Reips, U. D. (2012). Using the internet to collect data. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, R. Gonzalez, D. L. Long, A. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 291–310). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-017
Rezabek, R. J. (2000). Online focus groups: Electronic discussions for research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1).
Suzuki, L. A., Ahluwalia, M. K., Arora, A. K., & Mattis, J. S. (2007). The pond you fish in determines the fish you catch: exploring strategies for qualitative data collection. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006290983
Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
